It's probably no surprise that over the years,
the way I read has been profoundly changed by Charlotte
Mason's principles. Reading slowly, enjoying several books at a time, paying close attention, and even narration have all worked their way
into my own reading
habits. I'm trying new genres, and discovering that I like them (for the
most part). However—color me prejudiced—I have always preferred long,
satisfying reads. I'm more than happy to hang on for several
hundred pages while
an author introduces me to a brand new world, it's rules, and it's
inhabitants. It's
the mental equivalent of a giant pot of deliciously satisfying lamb stew.
While I have expanded the
kinds of reading I enjoy, I stubbornly
clung to my deliciously long books. Over and over again, I turned my nose up at short
stories. How can you learn to love a character in twelve pages? It's
ridiculous. I positively sneered at essays. Humph, they are over before
they even get properly going. (Shades of
Kipling's camel, and we all
know what happened to
him.) No. No thanks. Not interested. Humph.
Then I met this book:
If Robert Jordan's
Wheel of Time series is the
equivalent of a pot of bubbling, thick stew (a massive pot of
ridiculously thick stew with a whole lot of random ingredients... but I
digress), Anne Fadiman's book of essays is a platter of those tiny
little entrées at a gourmet restaurant. They may not be large, but they
are beautiful to look at, the flavors are a blend of familiar and
surprising, and the textures combine perfectly. Reading them is an
experience to be savored, not a Country Buffet to stuff myself at.
Ex Libris
is filled with essays about books and the thrills of being a
bibliophile, so I'll admit that I was inclined to enjoy it before I even
began. Still, I was surprised by how much I like the format. Essays are
short and to the point, but they aren't necessarily simple. Fadiman's
stories make me laugh. I recognize myself in them. Favorite bits have me
nodding along as I read. However, when I get to the end of the essay,
it turns out not to be the end of the story. I find myself turning bits
and phrases over in my mind. After reading the second essay, "The Joy of
Sesquipedalians," I found myself mumbling
sesquipedalian,
grimoire, and
mephitic
under my breath as I made the bed and vacuumed the floor. (Especially mephitic. It WAS housecleaning day, after all.) I was
thinking about Tennyson and the beauty of his lines while I brushed my
teeth. I felt an Ah Ha! moment while listening to a lecture about the
value of beauty, for it's own sake rather than for any utilitarian
purpose. Yup, that's exactly what she meant when she talked about the
glory of those big, rollable words. Fadiman's insights have lingered far
beyond the few pages her stories themselves take up.
Maybe
it's a function of maturity. More likely, it's a matter of getting used
to something new. Like Tiger and her vegetables, it has taken many
tentative stabs at this new genre—a taste here (quickly spat out), then a
little nibble here (not quite so bad, but hardly marvelous), a few bits
of Aldo Leopold's
A Sand County Almanac over here (ooooh, I might actually like this), and then something clicks. My palette expands. A new love is born.
Once
again, I find that Miss Mason is a wise woman. While she speaks specifically of curriculum, I find that my own self-education needs do not vary in any essential way from my students' needs.
“In the nature of things then the unspoken demand of
children is for a wide and very varied curriculum; it is necessary that
they should have some knowledge of the wide range of interests proper to
them as human beings, and for no reasons of convenience or time
limitations may we curtail their proper curriculum”
(Vol. 6, p. 14).
There is so much out
there beyond my regular genres, my familiar styles. Don't quit on your
kids—or yourself—if you don't click with everything the first time you
encounter it. Don't limit yourself to the things you are used to. Life is a big feast, and part of its wonder is the
wide variety of goodness, truth, and beauty.
How about you? Have you been surprised lately by a new author, book, or genre?
1) I think you know I am a great fan of the camel and his HUMPH;
ReplyDelete2) My wish list on Amazon just got one book longer. Sigh.
1) You know I was thinking of you when I wrote that, right?! Aren't those drawings a perfect match for Kipling's story?
Delete2) You're welcome. ;)
1) Aww. How nice! I am associated with the camel and his hump. I'll try to take that in the spirit intended and not too literally:). Yes, the drawings are a perfect match!
ReplyDelete1b) My youngest not yet in Y1 child discovered my Boris Karloff audio of Just So Stories. Since it was he who began chanting HUMPH before the tender age of two when we first listened to them I couldn't resist when he begged to listen earlier this week.
2) Enabler. :)